data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4cab/a4cab7318c7ff672776e0599d4c9730a2350924e" alt="Sizewise net"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0b72/d0b724f488cb65281c6db0167a2b07c7b4aa1ed6" alt="sizewise net sizewise net"
Of pests and diseases in Bt cotton cultivation was considerably low when compared to The number of sprays (9.4) and the cost incurred (Rs. Regarding the scenario of the sucking pests no much difference is observed over Bt and Reported as severe in non Bt cotton as opined by about 60-70 per cent of the sample
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7530d/7530de2152120be1a6389f3e7f8c647331cc22c4" alt="sizewise net sizewise net"
In the case of bollworms, including American, pink and spotted boll worms, low / no infestation is indicated by over 85 per cent of the sample respondents, whereas such incidents were Brent and Bajarang etc., because of high yields Followed by Bunny from NuziveeduĬompany, Chiranjeevi, Mallika, Dr. In Bt cotton, the hybrids preferred by the sample respondents were, Kanaka from Mahycoĭue to its wide adaptability, uniform maturity, easy picking, bigger boll size, stress toleranceĪnd rejuvenation, with the average yield of 20.18 q/ha. Similarly, in Gadag and Mysoreĭistricts the share of cotton in total insecticide consumption came down from 60 per centĪnd 36 per cent (2005) to 26.7 per cent and 6.12 per cent during 2010-11, respectively. Dharwad district, the consumption of insecticide in cotton came down from 115675 While the productivity was 277 kg lint per ha during 2000-01, it has increased to 382 kg lint / In addition similar trend was observed with respect to productivity. Non Bt cotton (9.09 %) cultivation.The production was 8.55 lakh bales of cotton during 2001 and it has increased to 11.63 lakh bales during 2010-11. Whereas, the share of seed cost is high in Bt cotton (8.61 %) when compared to the non-Bt (4.02 %).There was no significant difference in the share of fertilizers across Bt cotton (9.70 %) and The share of pesticide cost is considerably less in Bt cotton cultivation (15.42 %) when compared to the non Bt cotton cultivation (22.56 %). (1.68 in Bt cotton versus 1.26 in non-Bt cotton). The higher profitability of Bt cotton was also reflected in terms of benefit-cost ratio 11485.11/ha), accounting for an increase of 57 per cent. 26771.26 /ha) than from non Bt cotton (Rs. 39107.07).The net returns over total cost were much higher from Bt cotton production (Rs. 300/450 g).There was a significant difference in expenditure on plant protection chemicals (PPC’s)īetween Bt (Rs.6031.56/ha) and non Bt (Rs.9801.79/ha) farmers.The total cost of cultivation per ha including interest on working capital, land revenue,ĭepreciation charges and imputed value of family labour was worked out to be higher for Which was five-times higher than that of the local hybrid variety DCH-32 (Rs. Mentioned that Bt cotton (hybrid) seeds were initially sold at a price (Rs. 3368.2 /ha) in Bt cotton than in nonīt cotton (Rs.1746.85 / ha) farms, largely due to higher cost of Bt cotton seeds. The average expenditure on seeds was higher (Rs. Paradigm shift in the area from non Bt to Bt cotton leading to almost 73 per cent of theīt cotton area to the total cotton area in the state. It was observed that during a period from 2006-07 to 2010-11 there was a
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24973/249734a6cfc5cdad462d74d2a0366b9de1cf322e" alt="sizewise net sizewise net"
Bt cotton in the state and study districts have shown a phenomenal increase in the area in a
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/857e8/857e86bcfed681335bfd2eec9fa7f7ec161e746d" alt="sizewise net sizewise net"
Whereas, only 0.01 ha of land was under mixed cropping. Most of the sample farmers (93.86 %) were growing Bt cotton as a pure crop with an average area of 0.68 ha. The total land holding was very less (26 %). The total holding was more than 74 per cent (1.23 ha). Future releases will expand this capability to allow simulation of other operating systems.Rainfed agriculture was predominant in the study area as the proportion of rainfed area in â?¢ Simulation nation: Sizewise can simulate a menubar, Dock, and desktop to provide a realistic replica of what users will see. â?¢ Always ready: Sizewise stays tucked away in your menubar until it's needed, only one click away. Making testing content as simple as dragging a window into the simulator's frame.
Sizewise net simulator#
â?¢ Floatin' around: When shown, Sizewise's simulator window floats above all other windows, Choose one of the many included presets or define your own! â?¢ Flexible: Sizewise can simulate any resolution within the confines of your display.
Sizewise net software#
Sizewise is easy to use and works out of the box with popular software including long-standing industry standards like Adobe's Creative Suite line of applications. It allows its users to test their products on a variety of different screens simulated directly on their desktops, diminishing the need for testing with physical hardware. Sizewise is a simple but indispensable part of any designer's or developer's toolbox.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4cab/a4cab7318c7ff672776e0599d4c9730a2350924e" alt="Sizewise net"